Mammography · Dose

Mammography Dosimetry: Mean Glandular Dose (MGD)

Why is mammographic dose assessed via the mean glandular dose (MGD) rather than entrance dose alone? What is MGD, how is it computed, and what does it depend on? Grounded in AAPM TG-282 and Bushberg, with citations.

Why glandular dose?

In mammography, patient dose is expressed not simply as "entrance dose to the breast" but as the mean glandular dose (MGD). (Both are in mGy; the difference is which dose quantity is reported.) The reason is clear: the most radiosensitive — i.e. the most at-risk for cancer — component of the breast is the fibroglandular tissue. So the goal of dosimetry is to estimate the absorbed dose to the fibroglandular tissue, averaged over the whole breast — not to the skin or fat (AAPM TG-282/EFOMP).1

Terminology
AAPM TG-282 calls this quantity the average glandular dose (Dg); it is the same concept as MGD and AGD in the literature.1

How MGD is computed

MGD cannot be measured directly — there is no way to measure the dose inside the fibroglandular tissue in place. Instead it is estimated by multiplying a measurable quantity (incident air kerma) by a conversion coefficient.1 Bushberg writes the classic form:2

Dg = DgN × KESAK

Here KESAK is the entrance skin air kerma (ESAK; mGy) and DgN is the coefficient converting air kerma to average glandular dose. Depending on the formalism, whether backscatter is included must be stated explicitly; incident air kerma and entrance skin air kerma may differ on this point. DgN is computed by Monte Carlo simulation and depends on beam quality (HVL, kV), target–filter material, breast thickness and tissue composition.2 For example, for Mo/Mo at 26 kV and 0.35 mm Al HVL, the average glandular dose is about 19% of the entrance kerma (DgN ≈ 0.19).2

AAPM TG-282 modernizes this: using standard breast models, conversion coefficients (γ) computed for monochromatic energies, an incident-air-kerma correction, and a realistic amount/distribution of fibroglandular tissue, Dg is estimated more accurately.1

What it depends on

At the same entrance kerma, the main factors that set MGD:

Target–filter combinations

The mammographic spectrum is shaped by the choice of target (anode) and filter; typical tube voltage is ~25–35 kVp. Mo and Rh targets produce useful K-characteristic peaks; the filter, via its K-absorption edge, transmits a narrow energy band.2

Target (anode) Filter Typical use
Molybdenum (Mo) Mo 0.030 mm Thin/medium breast (classic)
Molybdenum (Mo) Rh 0.025 mm Thicker/denser breast
Rhodium (Rh) Rh 0.025 mm Thick/dense breast
Tungsten (W) Rh / Ag 0.05 mm; Al 0.7 mm Digital systems (common)

Bushberg notes that digital mammography systems now mostly use a W target; and a Mo filter should not be used with an Rh target.2

The role of compression

Compression matters not only for image quality but for dose. Adequate, correctly applied compression spreads overlapping tissue, reduces motion blur, and can lower the required exposure by reducing breast thickness.2 So compression is one of the most direct practical ways to lower mean glandular dose.

Tomosynthesis (DBT) dosimetry

In digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) the tube moves along a small arc to acquire many low-dose projections. AAPM TG-282 defines its formalism not only for standard mammography but also for DBT and the contrast-enhanced (CEDM/CEDBT) variants under a single framework, enabling consistent glandular-dose calculation across exam types.1

Acceptance levels for a standard phantom

Quality-control / acceptance levels (standard breast)
  • US (MQSA): the average glandular dose per view for a standard phantom must not exceed 3.0 mGy.23
  • Europe (EUREF): acceptable/achievable dose levels are defined for a standard breast (4.5 cm PMMA), of the order of ~2–2.5 mGy.4
Important
These values are for a standard phantom or standard breast model. A real patient's mean glandular dose varies with breast thickness, glandularity, compression, target–filter combination and AEC settings. They should not be read as a "dose limit" for an individual patient; the goal is to keep glandular dose as low as possible while preserving diagnostic image quality.
Related articles
For how the mammography unit works: Mammography (modality). For general exposure parameters: Exposure Parameters.

References

  1. Sechopoulos I, et al. Joint AAPM Task Group 282 / EFOMP Working Group Report: Breast dosimetry for standard and contrast-enhanced mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Medical Physics, 2023. (Modern ortalama glandüler doz formalizmi ve dönüşüm katsayıları.)
  2. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011. Bölüm 8 (Mammography). Atıflardaki sayfa numaraları bu baskıya aittir.
  3. U.S. FDA. Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), 21 CFR 900 — standart fantom için poz başına ortalama glandüler doz üst sınırı 3,0 mGy. fda.gov
  4. European Commission / EUREF. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis (4th ed.) — standart memede (4,5 cm PMMA) kabul edilebilir/ulaşılabilir glandüler doz seviyeleri. op.europa.eu
Note: This content is for education; for clinical decisions or regulatory compliance, consult a qualified medical physicist and current regulations.

← All articles